In certain dyadic studies information have now been gathered from both lovers individually, centering on points of overlap and distinctions between partners’ records, learning such dilemmas whilst the symbolic concept of appropriate unions for same-sex couples (Reczek, Elliott, & Umberson, 2009; Rothblum et al., 2011b), parenting experiences (Goldberg, Kinkler, Richardson, & Downing, 2011), closeness characteristics (Umberson, Thomeer, & Lodge, in press), interracial relationship characteristics (Steinbugler, 2010), partners’ interactions around wellness behavior (Reczek & Umberson, 2012), and relationship satisfaction and closeness (Totenhagen et al., 2012). In comparison, other research reports have gathered information from lovers simultaneously, through joint interviews, experiments, or ethnographic findings, centering on interactions between lovers or lovers’ collective reactions. As an example, scientists purchased observational ways to offer unique insights into same-sex partners’ conflict styles (Gottman, 1993), unit of home work (Moore, 2008), and coparenting interactions (Farr & Patterson, 2013).
Challenges and Strategies for studying relationships that are same-Sex
Although present information are seen as an a few restrictions, this really is no reason at all in order to avoid the research of same-sex relationships. Indeed, it is critical to triangulate a selection of qualitative and quantitative research designs and resources of information in efforts to determine consistent habits in same-sex relationships across studies and also to draw in innovative strategies that add to the understanding of same-sex relationships. Continuar leyendo «A specially problematic approach for pinpointing people in same-sex relationships could be the usage of proxy reports.»